The Battle for Speed: Client Render, Server Render, and Serverless
In the quest for lightning-fast digital experiences, developers face a crucial decision: how to deliver information to users. The answer lies in three distinct approaches: client render, server render, and serverless. Each has its strengths and weaknesses, which we’ll explore in depth.
Client Render: Freedom for the Server
In client render, the server sends a small amount of code to the user’s device, which then builds the page. This approach liberates server resources, making them faster and more efficient. To achieve this, create an HTTP server that returns an HTML file, which references resources in the public folder. The client-render.js file is fetched by the browser, building the page on the spot.
Pros and Cons of Client Render
- Pros: fewer server resources used, fast navigation, and no page reloads necessary.
- Cons: rendering time varies depending on the client browser and machine, slow due to larger payload and requests, and may not load if JavaScript is disabled.
Server Render: Speed and Consistency
Server render takes a different approach, sending the complete, pre-built page to the user’s browser. This method ensures consistent rendering time across devices and is ideal for search engine optimization (SEO). To implement server render, create an HTTP server that renders the page using handlebars and sends the complete result back to the client.
Pros and Cons of Server Render
- Pros: fast initial page load, consistent rendering time, and better SEO scoring.
- Cons: increased server resources used, navigation requires reloading, and can be tricky to set up.
Serverless: Scalability and Flexibility
Serverless architecture eliminates the need for server maintenance, automatically scaling with usage. This approach can be applied to both client and server render methods. However, it’s most advantageous when used for individual functions that don’t occur frequently in an application.
Pros and Cons of Serverless
- Pros: automatically scales with usage, lower cost, and no server maintenance required.
- Cons: price is dictated by requests and usage, can be costly, and may experience “boot” time when a function is called after a period of inactivity.
The Hybrid Approach
In the end, there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. A hybrid approach, combining the strengths of each method, is often the best way forward. For example, using server-side rendering for the initial page load and client-side rendering for subsequent pages can provide the perfect balance of speed and efficiency.
Debugging Made Easy
Debugging code can be a daunting task. That’s why LogRocket’s frontend monitoring solution is here to help. Our tool tracks user engagement, providing insights into errors and allowing you to fix them faster. Try it for free today!